Comparisons
Honest, side-by-side comparisons of affiliate, attribution, and analytics tools, judged on the revenue they can actually prove.
Comparison content is usually written by whoever is being compared, which is why so much of it reads like a checklist where one column happens to be full. These are written to a different rule: every comparison names what the other tool does better, and every verdict is tied to a specific situation rather than a winner.
The tools covered fall into three groups. Affiliate platforms, judged on tracking accuracy, payout coverage and what happens when you outgrow the starter tier. Attribution and analytics tools, judged on whether they can connect a click to money rather than to an event count. And mobile measurement partners, where pricing models differ enough that the right choice at ten thousand installs is the wrong one at a hundred thousand.
Pricing is stated with the conditions attached, because per-install, per-tracked-user and percentage-of-revenue models are not comparable at a glance and the crossover points matter more than the headline rate.
Affiliateo appears in several of these. Where it does, the limitations are stated alongside the strengths. A comparison that never concludes against the publisher is an advertisement, and it should be read as one.